NEWS

Lawsuit Alleges Army Doctor Secretly Filmed Patients; Impact Felt in BG

A new lawsuit alleges covert recordings during gynecologic exams in a military clinic—raising urgent questions for Fort Campbell-area patients and Bowling Green families who rely on TRICARE.

By Bowling Green Local Staff6 min read
TL;DR
  • The filing says multiple patients only learned of the recordings after investigators notified them, and it argues the conduct violated federal priv...
  • Attorneys for the plaintiffs say the alleged recordings have left their clients fearful of seeking care and uncertain about who has seen the footag...
  • Department of Health and Human Services’ guidance on the law HHS.

Army Gynecologist Filming Accusations Rock Military Community

A newly filed civil lawsuit alleges an Army gynecologist secretly recorded patients during sensitive exams, a claim laid out in court papers that describe hidden video taken without consent during routine pelvic visits, according to the complaint filed this week. The filing says multiple patients only learned of the recordings after investigators notified them, and it argues the conduct violated federal privacy protections and military medical policy, per the same court document.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs say the alleged recordings have left their clients fearful of seeking care and uncertain about who has seen the footage, according to the complaint. The Defense Health Agency oversees military treatment facilities and is responsible for protecting patient information under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, known as HIPAA, which sets national privacy standards, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ guidance on the law HHS.

Why These Allegations Are Resonating Beyond One Clinic

The lawsuit does not publicly detail the doctor’s full employment history or prior disciplinary actions, focusing instead on the alleged recordings and how they were discovered, per the complaint. Active-duty military clinicians practice within facilities administered by the Defense Health Agency, which sets uniform privacy expectations at military hospitals and clinics, according to DHA’s organizational overview DHA. The agency implements HIPAA through Department of Defense privacy rules that bar unauthorized capture or disclosure of patient information DoD Instruction 6025.18.

These allegations also put a spotlight on chaperone policies for sensitive exams. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends trained chaperones and clear consent for pelvic and breast exams to protect patients and clinicians alike, according to ACOG’s guidance on observers and chaperones ACOG. Advocates note that medical privacy breaches and covert recordings have sparked large civil cases in civilian systems, including a $190 million settlement involving a Johns Hopkins gynecologist a decade ago, according to contemporaneous reporting by the New York Times NYT.

Bowling Green’s Connection and Community Response

Fort Campbell is the primary Army medical hub for south-central Kentucky, including many military families who live, work, or study in Bowling Green. Military beneficiaries in the region often receive care at Blanchfield Army Community Hospital or through TRICARE’s network clinics in Warren County, according to Blanchfield’s official patient information site Blanchfield. That proximity makes the allegations feel immediate for local veterans, Guard families, and Western Kentucky University students who are military-affiliated.

Local veteran service organizations and campus advocates say trust in exam rooms is foundational and urge anyone with concerns about care to speak up and document their experience, according to standing guidance commonly shared by patient safety and advocacy groups. WKU’s Military Student Services provides navigation help for students and dependents on TRICARE access and referrals, according to the university’s resource page WKU Military Student Services.

Local impact: What Bowling Green patients can do now

  • Request a chaperone for any sensitive exam. ACOG advises clinics to make chaperones readily available and to document consent and the presence of a chaperone in the medical record ACOG.

  • Report concerns. Military patients can contact the Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Division to report potential crimes in military settings Army CID, the DoD Inspector General Hotline for misconduct or privacy violations DoD IG Hotline, and the facility’s Patient Advocate (listed on the Blanchfield site) Blanchfield.

  • Civilian care in Warren County. TRICARE-network patients seen off-post can also file complaints with the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure for Kentucky-licensed clinicians KBML and use the Military Health System Nurse Advice Line for guidance Nurse Advice Line.

How Military and Legal Systems Are Responding

The Defense Health Agency typically removes providers from patient care and initiates parallel administrative reviews when serious allegations arise, while military or civilian law enforcement investigates potential crimes, according to DHA’s role in facility oversight DHA. If the accused clinician is active-duty, charges could include indecent recording or visual sexual exploitation under Article 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice 10 U.S.C. § 920c. If a civilian employee is implicated on federal property, prosecutors could rely on the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act, which criminalizes covert recording in areas with a reasonable expectation of privacy 18 U.S.C. § 1801.

Health law specialists note that civil cases often hinge on whether a provider violated consent, privacy statutes, and hospital policy, and on the facility’s duty to safeguard devices and spaces where exams occur, according to standard analyses of health privacy litigation in federal court. Military hospitals also face compliance questions under HIPAA and DoD privacy rules if any protected health information was captured or shared without authorization HHS DoD Instruction 6025.18.

What’s Next for the Lawsuit

The court will set a schedule for the case, including deadlines for the military’s or government’s response, discovery, and any early motions that could narrow the claims, according to standard federal civil procedure. Plaintiffs often seek protective orders to secure or delete any recordings and to notify all potential victims, steps that can run in parallel with criminal inquiries, per common practice in similar privacy cases.

Military leaders typically review chaperone protocols, device restrictions in exam rooms, and patient notification procedures after credible allegations, according to DHA’s broader patient safety framework DHA. For Bowling Green families, the immediate questions are practical: how to confirm chaperone availability, how to request medical records, and whom to contact if something felt wrong during a past visit. Blanchfield lists its Patient Advocate office and medical records requests on its public site Blanchfield.

What to Watch

  • The court’s first scheduling order and any motions from the government or defense seeking dismissal or to limit discovery.

  • Any Defense Health Agency updates on interim safeguards for sensitive exams at military facilities in the Fort Campbell catchment area, and whether clinics in TRICARE’s local network mirror those steps.

  • Guidance from WKU and local veteran groups to support military-affiliated students and families seeking care or reporting concerns.

Frequently Asked Questions